Sunday, January 12, 2020

Ahimsa in Jainism


Introduction

Swami Vivekananda  defines Non-violence as never producing pain by thought, word, and deed, in any living being, According to him there is no virtue higher than non - injury. There is no happiness higher than what a man obtains by this attitude of non - offensiveness, to all creation.
It can not be denied that Ahimsa or non – violence is a universal law, and has been accepted in all cultures and all religions in some form or the other. “Treat others as you want to be treated” – this fundamental principle of existence has been reiterated in all religions.
Yet Ahimsa and its practice have taken different form in different religions due to times and situations in which they evolved. This can also be seen in the three religions under our study viz. Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism and is reflected in the lives of the founders and prophets of these religions and in their mythologies.
 Mythologically, Hinduism does not seem to advocate absolute non–violence. Animal sacrifice in Yajnas was prevalent in ancient India. Besides, Hindu epics and puranas are full of stories of warring kings and emperors. Even Mahabharta and Ramayana are no exceptions. Finally many gods and goddesses of Hindu pantheon wield weapons of violence. If this be considered an evidence, Hinduism seems to accept Ahimsa only conditionally
Jains have twenty four prophets, all of whom were kshatrias by birth, but gave up non-vegetarian food and wars and became monks. Mahavira, the last tirthankara did intense austerities and forbore extreme hardships. He was so fully established in non–violence that even a venomous snake could not harm him and was tamed.
Buddhism is replete with Jataka stories which emphasize compassion of the Bodhisattva. Buddha too was an embodiment of compassion and was ready to sacrifice his own life to save even a lamb. He also influenced two kings and dissuaded them from killing in war.
From this introductory preview, we infer that in Jainism, Ahimsa is given the place of the highest virtue; in Buddhism, it is equated with compassion, and in Hinduism it is only one of the values to be practiced as a means to other end like dharma or moksha.

Precepts on Non –Violence in Jainism

Ahimsa is the very soul of the Jain way of life. It is that fulcrum on which the whole conduct of a Jain revolves. According to Jain scriptures ahimsa is a goddess which supports all creatures. It is like water for the thirsty, food for the hungry and medicine for the sick (Prashnavyakarana sutra 2.1.21-22). It conduces to the well-being of all creatures, moving or immobile. According to Sutrakritanga, one must always remember that Ahimsa is the essence of religion. To be learned implies that one must not kill any creature (Sutrakritanga 1.4.10). Whether knowingly or unknowingly one should not kill living beings, mobile or immobile, in this world nor should cause them to be killed by others. Just as pain is not agreeable to you, it is so with others. Knowing this principle of equality, treat other with respect and compassion. Mahavir has said, “Killing a living being is killing one's own self; showing compassion to a living being is showing compassion to oneself. He who desires his own good, should avoid causing any harm to any living being. The being whom you want to kill is the very same as you are yourself, the being whom you want to be kept under obedience is the very same as you yourself.” (Samana Suttam, 147-159)  It is stated in Dashavaikalika sutra that since Ahimsa does good to all creatures, it is given the highest place by Lord Mahavir (6.9). according to Acharaya Amritchandra Suri, all the rules of conduct and moral codes, inhibitions and injunctions, come under the preview of Ahimsa. (Purushartha-siddhi-upaya)  
In the modern times, Mahatma Gandhi has laid the greatest stress on Ahimsa. Having been born and brought up in Gujrat, Gandhiji was greatly influenced by Jainism in general, and by a Jain saint, Srimad Rajchandra in particular. His spiritual mentor too was a Jain. And there could be no better introduction to the Jain concept o fAhimsa than some of the views of Gandhiji. Literally speaking, ahimsa means non-violence. But According to him, it has much higher, infinitely higher meaning. It means that you may not offend anybody; you may not harbour uncharitable thought, even in connection with those who consider your enemies. To one who follows this doctrine, there are no enemies. A man who believes in the efficacy of this doctrine finds in the ultimate stage, when he is about to reach the goal, the whole world at his feet. If you express your love- Ahimsa-in such a manner that it impresses itself indelibly upon your so called enemy, he must return that love.
            The word nonviolence connotes a negative, almost passive condition, whereas the Sanskrit term ahimsa suggests a dynamic State of mind in which power is released. When Gandhi speaks of ahimsa as a law, we should take him at his word. Indeed, it was a law for him like gravity; and could be demonstrated in the midst of human affairs. Gandhi even characterized his practice of ahimsa as a science, and said once, "I have been practicing with scientific precision nonviolence and its possibilities for an unbroken period of over 50 years." He was a precise man, meticulous and exacting. He valued experience as the test of truth, and the nonviolence he pursued and called "true nonviolence" had to conform to experience in all levels of human affairs. "I have applied it," he declares, "in every walk of life: domestic, institutional, economic, political. And I know of no single case in which it has failed." Anything short of this total application did not interest Gandhi, because ahimsa sprang from and worked in the same continuum as his religion, politics, and personal life. Daily practice could determine its value, "when it acts in the midst of and in spite of opposition," and he advised critics to observe the results of his experiments rather than dissect his theories.
Of the five vows or vratas viz. non-violence, truth, abstinence from stealing, chastity and non possessiveness, ahimsa or non-violence is the first and the main vow. According to Sri Srut Sagara Suri, truth etc. are meant to support this main vow ahimsa, just as water, manure etc. are meant for the germination of the plant from the seed, and its growth(Commentary on Tattvartha Sutra).
            In Jain thought carelessness (pramada) is intimately associated with Ahimsa. A person who is passionate or acts thoughtlessly or one who tries to practice ahimsa cunningly and at the same time wants to satisfy his strong passions, is called a pramatta. In Jainism anger, pride, deceit and greed are categorized as passions (kashaya). Again, one having strong attachment to worldly objects and given too much to sleep is also a pramatta. The idea is that Ahimsa cannot be rightly practiced unless a person is careful and alert in every way.
This leads to another concept of Ahimsa in Jainism: that of internal, mental or nishchaya ahimsa and external, empirical or vyavahara ahimsa. According to this concept one is not liable to sin even if he injures creatures but is free from passions. Quoting Pravachansara, Sruta Sagar Suri states that if minute insects die crushed under the feet of a sage who walks carefully so as to avoid injury to creatures (irya samity, to be explained later), the sage does not incur sin. On the contrary a pramatta or a careless person incurs sin of violence (himsa) whether injury is caused by him or not. Arguing in this line it is concluded that absence of attachment and other passions is ahimsa and their presence is himsa. That does not mean that external himsa is totally unimportant.
The whole world is full of creatures large or small. How then can a monk live without causing injury to any creature? The answer is that a careful monk engaged in meditation and contemplation does not incur sin merely by killing small creatures. Besides creatures are of two types, minute and large. The minute ones cannot be stopped in there movement neither do they obstruct others, hence injury to them is not considered himsa. All effort must be made to prevent injury to the larger creatures and one who does so is a true ahimsaka.
On the basis of the above principles, Jains have evolved an elaborate life style and rules and regulations of conduct. These rules of conduct have been divided into two: Those for monks and those for householders. The vows of monks are called Mahavratas and that of house holders, anuvratas. The commentator of Purusharthasiddhiupaya, Ajit Prasad Jain, states that it is important for an ahimsaka to take the vows. One not taking the vows would have an inclination towards himsa whether he practically commits it or not. (Purusharthasiddhiupaya commentary on 48th verse).
For the perfect practice of Mahavratas, Jains  have also classified creatures into five categories according to the sense organs; the first and the subtlest being the ones with only one sense organ of touch and the most evolved having all five sense organs. When a practitioner does not kill mobile as well as immobile beings in thought, word and deed, even in dream, he is observing mahavratas.
The rules of conduct conducive to ahimsa include what are called guptis and samitis i.e. restraints and careful conduct which are extremely useful in observing mahavratas. Guptis include:

  1. Manas Gupti or restraint of mind: An ahimsaka must control his mind and must not think evil thoughts. He must only think noble thoughts which make him purer and more unselfish.
  2. Vachana Gupti: A practitioner of ahimsa refrains from uttering harsh words that may insult others or hurt their sentiments. He does not flatter. Control of tongue means to speak less, but truthful and pleasant words.

Samitis include:

  1. Irya Samiti: This means carefulness while walking so that no insect or creature is injured.
  2. Bhasha Samiti: An ahimsak must give up back-biting, ridiculing others, talking ill of others, self praise or use of harsh words. He speaks what is good for himself and others. This carefulness in speech is called Bhasha samiti.
  3. Eshana Samiti: This rule applies to monks and entails carefulness in accepting food from others so that no harm is caused to anyone.
  4. Adananikshepa Samiti: An ahimsaka must keep a thing on the ground or lift it after careful inspection so that no creature is hurt.
  5. Alokita-pana-bhojana Samiti: To eat and drink during the day preferably in sun light so that one can clearly observe and avoid injury to creatures, which may not be possible in dark.
  6. Utsarg Samiti: This requires discharge of excrements at a place free from living beings and where there is no objection from anybody.

Ahimsa anuvrata:
            For the fulfillment of Ahimisa anuvrata, a Jain householder practices seven  vratas. They are:

  1. Digvrata: which involves restriction of movement only within specified area and abstaining from going outside the restricted area. Observance of this vow makes the householder a follower of Mahavrata onside the restricted area.
  2. Deshavrata: i.e. not to go to impure or objectionable places, within the restricted area.
  3. Anartha danda-vrata: to give up certain sinful activities.
  4. Samayika vrata: vow of regular meditation on equality of all creatures.
  5. Pradosh-upavasa vrata: vow to keep fast on 8th and 14th lunar day in a fortnight.
  6. Upabhoja-paribhoja parinama-vrata; vow to set restriction on the use of items of food and drink, and the use of bedding, utensils, bags etc.
  7. Atithisamvibhaga vrata: vow to entertain guests with food etc.

The first three are called guna vrata and the latter four are called shiksha vratas

The Jain acharayas have gone into great details of these seven observances or vows, and have also stated the ways by which these vows might get vitiated. For example in the third vrata, the practitioner must avoid thinking of harming others, jealousy, advising people to do unfair trade, or informing fisherman where fish or animals are available, encouraging people to sell or purchase cattle, to dig earth, light fire etc. without any purpose; collect and sell creatures like cats, snakes, dove etc. or articles like poison or swords, and to read or make others read or listen to books that develops the feeling of himsa, jealousy or attachment.
One may get the impression that agriculture and use of weapons against an enemy by a king are not endorsed by Jainism. However, Jinasene clarifies that agriculture as a means of livelihood for a householder, and use of arms for protection against an enemy are allowed. Somadeva, however states that a ruler should not use weapons while dealing with the weak, the virtuous and the innocent. We can conclude that agriculture and use of arms, when essential is not prohibited in Jainism.

The Ahimsa anuvrata is transgressed in five ways:

1.      Bandha: i.e. to tie an animal or to restrain any being from going freely to the desired places.
2.      Vadha: to beat with stick.
3.      Cheda: to pierce nose, ear or other limbs of any animal.
4.      Atibhararpana: to load animals beyond their power of carrying and,
5.      Anna-pana-nirodha: not to supply food and drink to human beings or cattle at the time when they require.

Transgression of Digvrata  Digvrata also can be transgress in five ways.

  1. By going beyond the prescribed limit over a mountain.
  2. By going down in a well.
  3. By entering holes and caves by crawling.
  4. By increasing the limits of area set earlier, prompted by greed, infatuation or for purpose of sale of articles to get more profit and
  5. By going  beyond the restriction, forgetting them.

Transgressions of Deshavrata include sell or purchase of articles in the prohibited area; to get one’s work done through some one also in the prohibited area; to convey one’s message to people residing in the prohibited area secretly or through signs like coughing etc.; to get the work done in the prohibited area by showing one’s body or limbs, or by throwing pebbles. Needless to say, this transgression will have different implications in the present changed circumstances.

Transgressions of Anarthadanda vrata include use of discourteous words mixed with mockery on account of excessive attachment, infatuation; making indecent bodily movements, unguarded and excessive  speech, with obstinacy and without any purpose; doing too much without due deliberation or thought, and to spend too much on food items, intoxicants, and on property like furniture, ornaments, utensils etc.

Transgressions of Samayika Vrata  include evil activities of mind, speech and body fraught with anger, pride, illusion and greed; lack of control over ones limbs, use of meaningless words and remaining mentally pensive; lack of enthusiasm for meditation, and to forget the hymns and chants in praise of God due to lack of concentration.

Transgressions of Prosadhopavasa Vrata include use of place for answering calls of nature without cleaning it or carefully inspecting it to avoid harming insects etc, lifting objects of worship without cleaning or inspecting them; sleep on a bed, without seeing or cleaning it; having disregard to religious duties due to hunger and thirst and to forget what is worth being done.
There are fifteen specified trades, which should be known and avoided by a Jain. They are:
Trades in which: (i)furnaces are used, (ii) trees are cut; (iii) Trades in fermented goods, such as liquor (iv) in earning by way of renting animals, birds, etc.; (v) Trades involving excavations and explosions (vi) Trades in ivory, bones, horns, fur, etc.(vii) in manufacturing or the processes concerned with crushing (viii) Trades in lard, honey, meat, fat, etc.(ix) in sealing wax, etc.(x) in poisonous and toxic substances, such as opium, and pesticides (xi) in which animals, birds, fish, etc. are tortured or killed (xii) in which animals, birds, etc. are amputated, (xiii) in which fires are set in forests, fields, etc. (xiv) in which lakes, wells, ponds, etc. are dried up (xv) in which wicked men, prostitutes, or call girls are supported.
Concept of Himsa in Jainism

            Since Ahimsa is given the greatest importance in Jain way of life, it is but natural that the Jain acharyas would go into the details of the concept of himsa also. According to Jainism, himsa is of two types: external, which is technically called dravya himsa and internal or mental, called bhava himsa. The soul or atman being eternal cannot be killed. Only pranas or life is destroyed in himsa which are ten in number: five powers of the senses, mind, speech, and the three components of the body viz. strength, respiratory activity and longevity. In external himsa one, more or all these are destroyed. The thought of himsa, which is a mental state, falls under the category of bhava himsa. Hence in Tattvartha Sutra himsa is defined as: Destruction of the ten vitalities or pranas by attachment, aversion or out of carelessness.
            These two types on himsa are further divided into four:
1)      Purely external or physical violence,
2)      Purely mental violence
3)      Both physical and mental violence
4)      Vocal violence.

In the first only physical himsa is caused, but there is no thought of it. For example, insects getting killed in spite of carefully walking due to their being too minute. In the second, the person resolves to hurt some one but is unable to act accordingly due to unfavorable circumstances; for example, a criminal resolving to kill the judge. In the third type both are present. In the fourth type, there is neither mental resolve nor physical action, but only unpleasant words are spoken. The harsh words spoken by parents towards their children or teachers towards their disciples, fall under this category. It is obvious that from the ethical standard physical violence coupled with mental resolve is the worst, followed by mental, purely physical without mental resolve, and purely verbal violence.
            Himsa may happen under three situations: It might have been committed; one may have committed against ones will and it might have just happened. The first type of himsa could have been committed consciously or unconsciously. In the first case the doer of the himsa is guilty since he has done it willfully. In second case also, he is guilty since he did it out of carelessness. In the second type of himsa the doer has been forced to commit himsa either physically or circumstantially. In either case, the doer of himsa incurs sin, although he can burn it in the fire of repentance. All compulsions and unavoidable situations are due to ones own weaknesses. The purpose of all moral struggles is to rise above these compulsions and helpless situations.

            According to another classification there are four types of himsa:
1)      Willfully committed
2)      Committed for self-defence
3)      Himsa involved in professional activities
4)      Himsa involved in activities for survival like cooking, washing etc.

The commitment of himsa and its fruit depend on the nature of thought. As has been said already, if one is ceaselessly thinking of causing harm to others, but does not get the opportunity or has not the courage to do so, he is a himsaka, even though he does not actually harm others, whereas a doctor with no intention of harming a patient treats him and the patient might die suddenly. Here actually the doctor has committed himsa but since his intention was to cure the patient, he is not liable for such himsa. ( Purusarthasiddhyupaya, 51)
           
            Sometimes himsa caused in greater degree brings small result, and little himsa produces serious result. (Ibid, 52) For example, a philanthropist digging a well for public welfare, kills innumerable insects, and another man may kill single insect just for fun. The amount of sin generated by a well-digger is much less than by the other person, who killed a single insect for fun.
            Two persons, committing himsa together might generate different degrees of evil karma. A servant accompanies his master to shoot a hare, much against his will. The sin due to the master is more than that of the servant, who went only out of fear of losing his job.

            Himsa is culpable sometimes before it is committed. For example, a man may have been contemplating and devising schemes to commit a murder but for some reason or other fails to put  his intention into action. Sometimes himsa is committed at the time of commission actually. The example is of a man who actually commits it. Himsa is culpable even if it is not committed. (Ibid, 54) For example; a person may attempt to commit a murder but may fail in his attempt. Thus, in all the three instances of himsa are culpable, for it is the intention to commit himsa that makes one a himsaka or ahimsaka.
            The sin of himsa may be suffered sometimes by many although committed by one individual only. For instance, a person may murder some one and he may be applauded by many. In that case the approvers also will be sinners. On the other hand, many people may commit himsa, but only one is guilty. A commander orders his soldiers to shoot all the wild animals around his building. The soldiers not wishing to kill them have to go against their wish to obey the commander. The sin committed there by clings in major portion to the commander.(Ibid, 55). Himsa may bring to one evil fruit and to another the fruit of ahimsa. For example, a duel may be taking place on the roadside. (Ibid, 56)  A number of people may come to witness it. One amongst the mob may come nearer to these persons (who are quarreling) and try to save the weaker from the stronger, whereas the others may instigate both of them to fight against each other. The former one gets the merit of ahimsa, the latter that of himsa.

            Similarly, ahimsa gives one the demerit of himsa, to another himsa gives the merit of ahimsa (Ibid, 57) A man may save an innocent one from an assailant. The other one may abuse him for having saved the victim. The former one gets, undoubtedly, the fruit of ahimsa, and the latter one is bound by the sin of himsa. If a man fails in his attempt to save an innocent victim, he will get the merit of ahimsa even though he did not succeed.7
Positive aspect of Ahimsa
            Sometimes a charge is made against the doctrine of Ahmisa to the effect that it is essentially negative in character in the sense that it always prohibits persons from doing certain activities. It is argued that in Jainism Ahimsa is treated as mere abstention from Himsa and people are advised in the negative manner such as not to speak lies, not to steal things, not to have worldly attachments, etc., The fact however is that in Jainism the positive aspect also has also been stressed. That is why Jainism urges its householders to always strive
(i) to follow the practice of giving Dana, i.e., religious gifts or charity, (ii) to organize welfare activities for the benefit not only of the weaker sections of society but also of animals, birds, etc., and (iii) to inculcate the spirit of toleration towards the followers of other faiths or religions.
Tattvartha Sutra recommends charity because in giving one's belongings to others one exercises control over his greed which is a form of Himsa.  In Purusharthasiddhi-upaya it is said: "In making a gift one gets over greed, which is a form of Himsa, hence gifts made to worthy recipients amount to a renunciation of Himsa. In the same text it is further stated that a person automatically becomes greedy if he does not give charity to worthy guests. With a view to raising the standard of giving gifts and in turn  of Ahimsa, it is laid down that the donor must have following seven qualities:
  1. Aihika-phala-anapeksha, i.e., he must not expect any reward in this world in exchange of gifts.
  2. Kshanti, i.e., he should have forbearance and should give calmly and without anger (which means the donor should not get excited if an unexpected or untoward thing happens while he was engaged in the pious act of giving gifts).
  3. Muditva, i.e., he must possess feelings of happiness and have joyous appearance at the time of giving gifts.
  4. Nishkapatata, i.e., he must act in all sincerity and should give without deceit.
  5. Anasuyatva, i.e., he should have no feelings of jealousy or envy.
  6. Avishaditva, i.e., he should not have any feelings of sorrow or repentance.
  7. Nirahankaritva, i.e., he should not have any sense of pride in giving gifts as pride
The donees or the recipients termed as Patrass are classified into three categories, viz.
  1. Supatras i.e., good donees (those who are having right belief and engaged in practicing vows),
  2. Kupatras, i.e., deficient donees (those who have right conduct but wrong belief), and
  3. Apatras, i.e., unworthy donees (those who have neither right conduct nor right belief).
Obviously, giving Dana to the Supatras is highly recommended; to the Kupatras is not encouraged and to the Apatras is definitely forbidden as there is no merit in giving them anything.
On the basis of various conditions laid down for giving Dana pertaining to the qualifications of the donors and the donees, Dana is classified into three types as follows:
  1. Sattvika Dana, i.e., virtuous or righteous gift, is the gift offered to a worthy donee by a donor possessing the seven Datr-gunas, i.e., qualifications of a good donor.
  2. Rajasa Dana, i.e., passionate or emotional gift, offered in self-aggrandizement for monetary display and in deference to the opinion of others.
  3. Tamasa Dana, i.e., vicious gift, is the gift offered through the agency of slaves or servants without considering whether the recipient is worthy or unworthy and without showing marks of respect.
Of these three types of Danas, the Sattivika Dana is regarded as the Uttama Dana, i.e., the best gift, the Rajasa Dana as the Madhyama Dana, i.e., the moderate or the secondary gift and the Tamsa Dana as the Jaghanya Dana, i.e., the worst or detestable gift.
It is not necessary that the Dana should  be a large one. On the contrary, the householders are advised to extend even small gifts but they should take care that these small gifts are given to the deserving persons. Such a small gift is praised in the standard sacred Jain work "Ratnakaranda Sravakachara" in the following words: "Even a small Dana (gift) given to a patra (proper or suitable donee), bears much desirable fruit for souls in the fullness of time, just as the (tiny) seed of the (Indian) fig tree, sown in (good) soil, produces (a tree, casting) magnificent shade".
According to another classification dana could be of two types viz., Patra-Dana and Karuna-Dana. The Patra-Dana means gifts made with respect and devotion to worthy recipients and in accordance with the conditions laid down. Such worthy recipients are generally the Jaina householders and ascetics who have right belief and are continuously engrossed in practicing vows prescribed for their stage in life. Karuna-Dana means gifts made out of compassion to any one who deserves it, being hungry, thirsty, diseased, distressed, disabled or helpless. Such a Karuna-Dana is of four kinds:
  1. Ahara-Dana, i.e., gift of food,
  2. Aushadhi-Dana, i.e., gift of medicines,
  3. Abhaya-Dana, i.e., gift of shelter, protection from danger, attack, intimidation, or threat, and
  4. Sastra-Dana or Vidya-Dana, i.e., gift of books, imparting of useful and beneficial knowledge,.
            These four gifts together are formed as "Chaturvidha-Dana", i.e., four-fold charity and it has been enjoined on the householders that they should make special efforts to give these charities to the needy. The first kind of charity, i.e., Ahara-Dana, has great value in the practice of Ahimsa. The Jaina scriptures have greatly valued the other three gifts too.
            The Jaina householders for several centuries have made it one of their cardinal principles to give these four gifts to all persons who are in need of such help. In fact, this help has also been extended to the protection and well-being of insects, birds and animals. Jainas have established alms-houses, rest-houses, dispensaries and educational institutions. Along with the dispensaries for men, the Jainas have been conducting special institutions known as Pinjarapols for the protection and care of helpless and decrepit animals and birds. In unusual times of flood and famine these Pinjarapols have been carrying out various activities for animal protection. There is hardly any town or village of Gujarat where there are no pinjarapols.

Bibliography

1.                  Tattvartha Sutra of Vacaka Umaswati
Commentary by Pt. Sukhdalji
L.D.Series 44,
L.D.Institute of Indology, Ahemedabad,2000
2.                  Tattvartha Vritti, of Sri Srutasagar Suri,
Commentary on Tattvarthas Sutra of Umasrvati with Hindi Translation
Bharthiya Janapith
18, Industrial Area, Lidi Road, New Delhi 110003, 2002
3.                  Jain Buddha aur Gita ke Achardarshano ka Tulnatmak Adhayan, Part I & II
by Dr. Sagral Jain,
Rajasthan Prakrit Bharti Sansthan, Jaipur, 1982
4.                  The Conception of Ahimsa in Indian thought
by Dr. Koshelya Walli, Bharat Mamisha, Pande Haveli, Varanasi, 1974
5.                  Purusharth Siddhi-Upaya by Amrit Chand